Monday, October 5, 2009

The slow death of the unified left...

http://peakenergy.blogspot.com/2009/09/slow-death-of-unified-left.html

The slow death of the unified left

Posted by Big Gav in politics, psychology

Excerpts:

The third contradiction is in the West, and it is the deforming effects that the political-economic system has on our culture. Uniquely in history, the contemporary west has made the cultural system subject to the economy, made it its market, raw material and dumping ground. For a century or more this process was held in check by conservative institutions, and, when these collapsed, through attacks by the counterculture, which (briefly) provided an alternative, something seemed to be in place until that offering also, collapsed. After that, the commodity and the commodified image moved to the center of social life. Since the commodity is essentially nihilistic – a commodity is simply something whose value is expressed in terms of every other value – its effect, initially liberating from inherited authority (the church, etc) is ultimately nihilistic too.

Socially, the effects of this are to create increasingly atomised societies, in which it is increasingly impossible to imagine solidarity or close connection beyond the immediate family - and then to offer as a substitute either a cynical and masochistic celebration of atomisation (ie most reality TV shows) or literal-minded religiosity, essentially channelled from the middle ages, ie from the last pre-capitalist period.

Psychologically, the effects are to create increasingly ungrounded people. If the society you grow up in is atomised, then an identity never ‘sets’. The liberation that offers is the freedom to determine your own identity. What it removes is the capacity for any identity to be meaningful.

3 comments:

D said...

"What it removes is the capacity for any identity to be meaningful."

That is awesome!

mlytle said...

Hi D,
Yep, the guy hit the nail on the head, I think...

Regards,
Mark

bill102205 said...

Mark: Article is difficult reading. Terminology, as with any subject is difficult to overcome!

So any terms here, as in investing have their own not so subtle meanings.

That being said, the author seems to blame the liberal for the decline of the individual and the decline of "inner directed individual"? I see his argument.

I came across clips from the movie "Network" recently. The article reminded me of it. William Holden's speech to Faye Dunaway on her inability to form a relationship. She was described as the TV generation that sees the world as a TV show. Hope I paraphrased his speech somewhat!